Author: craig@carterpix.com

  • High Museum of Art: Part 8

    High Museum of Art: Part 8

    Howard Finster

    I knew a little bit about Howard Finster before seeing this display. This maybe the first time I had seen any of his art outside a book or the internet. I became familiar with him and his work from one of my old bosses. I suppose he was as much a friend too. Anyway my boss was a big fan of Finster. He visited his Paradise Garden during the time I was working for him. He was blessed to meet with Mr. Finster. MI remember my boss was very excited about the experience, and told me all about it. He may have brought back some small piece of art that he may have shown me. This memory is from around 30 years ago, as I write this, so I can’t say one way or another what actually was said and done during that discussion. What I can say is it was my introduction to the genius of Howard Finster, for which I’m gratefully blessed.

    Howard J. Finster’s work is also enshrined in the Smithsonian American Art Museum. He was a pretty great artist, and fairly contemporary. His art is in my opinion is Olde Tymey Americana style. That’s not a real thing. I just made it up. It’s my best short description of his style. He was a preacher and most of his work focuses on the work of God, good and evil, peace and Hell. Most of his work, or a lot at least, has has written things directly from the Bible and his own interpretations. I’m far from an authority thought. Just posting my observations.

    Sadly Howard Finster has passed. He leaves behind a great legacy of art. He created an artistic landscape out of his Georgia home, Paradise Gardens. You can see and learn more from the Paradise Garden Foundation Instagram page. Hopefully the foundation will be able to keep it for a long time to come for the enjoyment and education of all.

    This is my humble dedication to my appreciation of this great man.

  • Happy 77th Birthday

    Happy 77th Birthday

    Mom looking good for her 77th birthday.

    I love you Mom.

    May you continue to bless our family for a long time to come.

  • High Museum of Art: Part 7

    High Museum of Art: Part 7

    I made an experimental video this morning. I’m pleased with the initial outcome. This was a fairly lazy experiment on a Sunday morning. Mostly just having a little fun, but I think I may explore the concept a little more.

    I was looking at my High Museum photographs and thought these guys were interesting.

    I started to play with them a little bit and decided to try something. I wanted to play with some strobe effects, some different colors, and different positioning. These two photos are in fact subtly different images though very similar. So I started with them as my base. I have one more similar image I plan to add to this project at a later time.

    As the title suggests these were photographed at the High Museum of Art in Atlanta on my trip in 2024. I don’t know the original artist I’m afraid. I will try find out who it is in the future.

    I also want to experiment a little adding video to my blog. This is the first video posted. I am going to try to link from YouTube. I don’t expect this to be too complicated, but isn’t that always the way it goes. Here goes nothing.

    That was easier than I thought. And I will leave this experiment here for the time being as I must leave for Church.

    EDIT: 2-10-25

    I added the third ball into the mix and dropped the time significantly for the second iteration.

    Edit 2-23-25

    Moving around the balz a little bit. This is kinda fun. Kinda…

  • High Museum of Art: Part 6

    High Museum of Art: Part 6

    These new addition include this very interesting essay. It is probably stretches the comprehension of most readers. I myself had to study it pretty closely to fully appreciate what it was saying. It is pretty heavy and dense with language not easily digested. But it all makes sense if you want to understand it enough. You just have to think about it more than most people are willing to think. I suppose there are probably a few odd people out there that grasp the content on the first pass, but I can’t imagine there any too many.

    The message is probably seen as pretty controversial and divisive, as are the subjects it describes, to the average person. The average person will probably not even be able to understand what is being said even if they are able to understand the literal language being used. Whoever wrote this, I’m afraid I don’t have an attribution, was thinking on an elevated level.

    There are three distinctive parts, and was (for me anyways) easier to digest when concentrating on each part individually. They all tie into each other though, and are well organized and combined for public display.

    Essay, High Museum, Giants collection
    Essay, High Museum, Giants collection

    These two painting are from the Giants collection. I’m not sure who to attribute here either, but wanted to share some interesting and thought provoking art.

    I expect I’ll revisit this post later today with some more thoughts. I however must bounce.

  • The Law of the Jungle

    The Law of the Jungle

    For reasons I’ll not expound upon, I was thinking about the Law of the jungle this morning. My memory of it was that it is to “kill or be killed.” I can’t recall when or where I got that definition of the law of the jungle, only that it was at some point in my childhood. But my nerdy self decided to revisit my memory of this thing. Thing, hmm, I suppose a law is a thing. I suppose this is a real law. It says it’s a law right in the title. It must be a real law or at least it is as far as I’m concerned. Not a law like don’t shoplift, but a universal law like gravity.

    What makes a law a law? Who decides? What percentage of a population must accept the law for it to be a accepted? If it isn’t accepted does it cease to be a law? If 99% of a population doesn’t accept the law of gravity, does that mean that the law of gravity isn’t a law? If 99% of a population don’t accept the law of averages will the universe tip over? I’m pretty sure I know what would happen if 99% of people didn’t accept the law to wear your seat belt. So one is a law in deed and the other in name. The seat belt law would change one way or another if nobody wanted to buckle up, and nobody did. It would be impossible for even the most zealous police force to enforce and maintain that order.

    Yes most of us know and understand the difference between these two types of laws. Most is probably being generous, but I digress. The point being one is theoretically immutable while the other is elastic. That got me thinking a little bit about how the law of the jungle is mostly the first, but has some elements of the latter. What I found was I was right and wrong.

    A quick internet search and I learned the law of the jungle isn’t really a law of either kind, but a phrase, a phrase attached to a set of laws wolves lived under. The phrase was introduced by Rudyard Kipling in his 1894 book “The Jungle Book.” The phrase was later expanded upon in the follow up, “The Second Jungle Book,” in 1895. I’m unsure where the “kill or be killed” I’ve attributed to it originated, or even if that was widely understood or isolated to my family and other small pockets.

    While not a law it is still powerful and relevant to this day. I know I’m not the only one familiar with it. I’m pretty sure this is a phrase used frequently in political rhetoric among other occasions. The phrase describes something that, as far as I can imagine, always has and always will be relevant. Relevant at least to the life forms currently understood by our collective human consciousness. Brute force wins. There are exceptions. But usually the strong survive while the weak perish.

    However my quick research led me to understand my interpretation of the law of the jungle, ” kill or be killed” wasn’t accurate. In some ways my understanding aligns Kipling’s poem “The Law of the Jungle.” However in my view the key word in the poem is obey. “Obey or be killed” instead of “kill or be killed.” Interesting how one word can make such a big difference. I have to wonder if that was intentional, and if so how it was manipulated.

    It’s interesting the things we think we know and how they differ from what is accurate. The only actual exposure I had with the Jungle Book was as a kid and seeing the movie. I don’t remember much at all about it. I don’t remember if the law of the jungle is even mentioned in the Disney film. I would assume it must be at least mentioned as Jungle Book is the source of the phrase, and the phrase has obviously been widely spread. I’m going to need to watch the Disney version again soon to satisfy my curiosity.

    In my opinion this poem is critical and subversive at the same time as it is plainly educational. I guess the whole Jungle Book thing was aimed at a younger audience. He was kind of an early childhood writer if my memory serves.

    I don’t know much about Kipling. I want to know more. So many interesting things in the world and so little time. I’m glad there are people dedicated to keeping his vision alive. I’ll definitely make some time for him.

    Now this is the Law of the Jungle — as old and as true as the sky;
    And the Wolf that shall keep it may prosper, but the Wolf that shall break it must die.
    As the creeper that girdles the tree-trunk the Law runneth forward and back —
    For the strength of the Pack is the Wolf, and the strength of the Wolf is the Pack.


    Wash daily from nose-tip to tail-tip; drink deeply, but never too deep;
    And remember the night is for hunting, and forget not the day is for sleep.
    The Jackal may follow the Tiger, but, Cub, when thy whiskers are grown,
    Remember the Wolf is a Hunter — go forth and get food of thine own.
    Keep peace with the Lords of the Jungle — the Tiger, the Panther, and Bear.
    And trouble not Hathi the Silent, and mock not the Boar in his lair.
    When Pack meets with Pack in the Jungle, and neither will go from the trail,
    Lie down till the leaders have spoken — it may be fair words shall prevail.
    When ye fight with a Wolf of the Pack, ye must fight him alone and afar,
    Lest others take part in the quarrel, and the Pack be diminished by war.
    The Lair of the Wolf is his refuge, and where he has made him his home,
    Not even the Head Wolf may enter, not even the Council may come.
    The Lair of the Wolf is his refuge, but where he has digged it too plain,
    The Council shall send him a message, and so he shall change it again.
    If ye kill before midnight, be silent, and wake not the woods with your bay,
    Lest ye frighten the deer from the crop, and your brothers go empty away.
    Ye may kill for yourselves, and your mates, and your cubs as they need, and ye can;
    But kill not for pleasure of killing, and seven times never kill Man!
    If ye plunder his Kill from a weaker, devour not all in thy pride;
    Pack-Right is the right of the meanest; so leave him the head and the hide.
    The Kill of the Pack is the meat of the Pack. Ye must eat where it lies;
    And no one may carry away of that meat to his lair, or he dies.
    The Kill of the Wolf is the meat of the Wolf. He may do what he will;
    But, till he has given permission, the Pack may not eat of that Kill.
    Cub-Right is the right of the Yearling. From all of his Pack he may claim
    Full-gorge when the killer has eaten; and none may refuse him the same.
    Lair-Right is the right of the Mother. From all of her year she may claim
    One haunch of each kill for her litter, and none may deny her the same.
    Cave-Right is the right of the Father — to hunt by himself for his own:
    He is freed of all calls to the Pack; he is judged by the Council alone.
    Because of his age and his cunning, because of his gripe and his paw,
    In all that the Law leaveth open, the word of your Head Wolf is Law.
    Now these are the Laws of the Jungle, and many and mighty are they;
    But the head and the hoof of the Law and the haunch and the hump is — Obey!

    Rudyard Kipling

    Good night.

  • High Museum of Art: Part 5

    High Museum of Art: Part 5

    Toyin Ojih Odutola starts us off with the next part of the series.

    Toyin Ojih Odutola was born in Nigeria and later moved to the United States with her family. She’s pretty young. A good bit younger than I. You can look up more of her bio and such using the link provided. She isn’t hard to find.

    I really liked her style. At least the style of these two pieces. My critique of art skills are lacking, and my education thereof is as well. Not knowing how to describe my opinion using the nomenclature of the genre, Ill just say I like the feel of them. I like the use of patterns in the textures. I really liked the color pallet and the use of contrast. I just pound her work interesting.

    I looked at the gallery page I posted and enjoyed the rest of the stuff I saw there too. A very talented person undoubtedly.I assume, based on the two pieces I am sharing, and the similarities with most of her work I saw on the gallery page, that she prefers drawings using different drawing tools, charcoal, pastel, and pencil as noted in the information cards displayed with her work.

    These next photos were from a display about old school hip hop. I believe these come from New York, but alas I didn’t capture any of the information cards. I will try to remember to do better with attribution now that I’m posting blog stuff.

    As an AV tech myself I found these displays pretty cool. I’ve actually used gear similar to that shown here when I was a younger man doing younger man stuff. I never was a hip hop guy. Mostly small scale video production and related endeavors.

    I’m sorry the electric piano is a little out of focus. I only took the one shot of it, and well, I should have done better. I’m always working to improve my skills, and my system.

    I don’t know who did these pieces. I got lucky in getting the info cards I did manage to capture on the first set here. It wasn’t exactly a conscious decision to capture that information, but I’m glad I did. I didn’t have any idea when I was at the museum that I’d be posting these on my blog. My blog didn’t even exist then.

    I do wish I could give credit. I hope I don’t ruffle any feathers. You can contact me if you want me to update your work with attribution. Heh, yeah right. Like any of these artists will ever look at this.

    I’m not going to say much about these except I liked them enough to capture them for my future enjoyment.

  • High Museum of Art: Part 4

    High Museum of Art: Part 4

    More, Art from the Dean Collection of Swizz Beatz and Alicia Keys : Giants

    This next group of photographs I took are from some pretty well known artists. I personally heard of both the featured artists I will showcase on this installment. I’m not exactly an encyclopedia of art history, but I do know more than some. I suppose this visit I’m highlighting just adds to my knowledge of the art world, and I’d say that’s a good thing. I’m even doing some research on the photographs I’m posting, so even more learning, yay.

    Jean-Michel Basquiat was an artist from New York city. Born in Brooklyn. This is only a small taste of his work. Clearly, the subject of this piece is the author Langston Hughes. Two impressive black artists to be sure. Yes, this whole experience has been educational. Too bad, education isn’t cool. I’m pretty sure I heard about Mr. Basquait from Mtv of all places. It used to be relevant, at least to me.

    Gordon Parks was an American photographer and composer. He was born in in Fort Scott, Kansas, in 1912. He lived to see 93 years. He was truly a great American photographer and artist. Apparently he did more than photography. I’m so glad I had this opportunity to see some of his work. I feel like I’ve heard of him and seen his work before. Maybe I have. I definitely have now, and I suppose you have too.

  • Not the usual Georgia day

    Not the usual Georgia day

    In this part of the world, middle Georgia, it’s rare, very rare, to get any snow at all. Never mind getting snow that sticks to the ground. Snow accumulation is almost unheard of. Accumulation of the magnitude we experienced last night is rare indeed.

    I got yesterday off work for a snow day. A lot of times the mere suggestion of snow is enough to shut a lot of this place down. There were pretty credible forecasts saying we would be getting it. And we did. It didn’t actually start snowing until mid to late afternoon. If we did have school yesterday I don’t think there would have been any weather related problems. But erring on the side of caution was wise, as accurately predicting when such an event will happen isn’t easy.

    The snow started around 3:00 pm. At least that’s when I noticed it. I took my camera out to document the occasion. A little while after it started snowing I got a couple shots of my back yard, which you will see here.

    Pretty exciting! I thought so. That is about the normal amount of snow that this area sees on the special occasion it sees any. But it kept snowing. It kept snowing well into the night. I took these following photos around 7:30pm. Hardly blizzard conditions for you northerners, but pretty amazing for the south.

    In the morning I had to check on the situation. My curiosity was almost at Christmas morning intensity. The scenery did not disappoint. I don’t remember ever seeing this much snow here in the twenty or so years I’ve called Warner Robins home. There was a time when I lived in Atlanta that was on par with this, but Atlanta is further north and a good bit colder.

    Day after snow, morning. Street panorama

    I’ve been busy today working on Carterpix stuff. I think I’ll go see how much is left at 2pm.

  • meatballs and marinara

    meatballs and marinara

    I made some meatballs and marinara sauce. I had some ground beef I needed to use and didn’t want to make Hamburger Helper. There’s nothing wrong with Hamburger Helper, I actually quite like it on occasion. But I wanted to do something a little more involved.

    I also thought that this would be a good time to try out my new strobe light. I was very well pleased with it for this application. The toast test I posted yesterday was the preliminary of this activity, and was a good breakfast too. I decided to use the white umbrella as a light modifier in this case, and am pleased with the results. I didn’t take a long time setting up a perfect shot. The stove is messy and it was mostly for fun. I’m not trying to start a professional food blog or some such. I just wanted to make some good food to enjoy. I also wanted to enjoy taking some photographs and test my new light. Plus it gives me something to blog about. I’m still figuring out this blog stuff, and every opportunity to do so is a learning experience.

    I was well pleased with the end result. Dinner was very nice. I didn’t think to take pictures of the prepared food. I was too hungry after all that work, lol.

    I am going to post the notes I made along with the some pictures.

    1 lb ground beef
    1 egg
    1/4 cup plain bread crumbs
    1/4 tsp black pepper
    1/4 tsp salt
    1/2 tsp minced garlic
    1 tbs parsley
    1 tbs dehydrated onions
    1 tbs milk
    1/4 cup parmesan cheese

    Preheat oven 400f
    Mix all ingredients except beef together in large bowl
    Once combined add the beef and mix, but not too mixed
    Aluminum foil on a baking pan and spray with no-stick
    Make balls and cook about 20 minutes

    I looked at a couple recipes then did what I wanted. I was mostly concerned with the amount of bread crumbs and eggs, as I had a limited amount.

    Pretty good. Not very spicy. I guessed at all these measurements except the beef, egg, and bread crumbs. Basically I used up stuff I had or just wagged it. But this is pretty close.

    For the sauce

    1 14oz can tomato sauce
    1 14 oz can diced tomatoes
    1 14 oz can of water
    1 1/2 tbs Italian seasoning
    1 1/2 tbs dried parsley
    2 bay leaf
    1 tbs minced garlic
    2 tsp salt

    about 8-9 of the meatballs I cooked earlier and had been in the refrigerator for several hours.

    Purée can of diced tomatoes, but not too much. You still want some of the tomato consistency. Then pour into pot.
    Pour tomato sauce into pot.
    fill can with water and pour into pot.
    Add all the spices and mix.
    Bring pot to boil for a few minutes, then reduce heat to medium-low and simmer for at least a half hour, preferably longer.
    When pot is boiling and well mixed add the meatballs. Be careful not to break up the meatball by stirring too hard. These meatballs held together well for me.
    Mix periodically.

  • Experimental toast

    Experimental toast

    This is a double experiment.

    The first part of the experiment was to take two photos using more or less the same settings and placement with the exception of the lighting modifier. I used my 105mm lens at f5.6 and 1/160sec and one AD200 Pro 2 set on TTL.

    The first set of images, I used a silver reflective umbrella to modify the light. These are the same image. The one on the right has been blown up and cropped.

    The second set of images, I used a white semi-transparent umbrella. I bounced the light off it just like I did with the reflective umbrella. Again it’s the same image in both cases, just cropped.

    The second part of this experiment involves the behavior of my blogging tools. I have spent some time today working on the formatting and templates and layouts and related things. I have had some troubles getting things to do what I want and expect, but I hope I have the set up like I want it now. If it’s not to my liking, I’ll probably leave this post alone for the greater part. But if I need to make adjustments to the settings of my site I will, and that is liable to change everything.

    It’s interesting how things are interrelated using these tools of WordPress and Elementor. It’s pretty fascinating to me while at times frustrating. I am enjoying learning though. I think I would rather stick to photography though, and keep my web developing on amateur status for now. This platform may not even be around much longer unfortunately. I have been reading about how the two guys that started WordPress are having disagreements and fighting each other in court and the arena of public opinion. It’s unfortunate that I started using this software because it has been around so long, is used to create a large percentage of of the websites on the web, and is open sourced.

    I wonder just how long open source licensees are going to last. It seems once a product gets big enough to make money then things start to get ugly.